Search and Top Navigation
#8523 closed bug (notabug)
Opened August 27, 2012 09:11AM UTC
Closed September 12, 2012 08:43AM UTC
Tamil Calendar localisation is incorrect
| Reported by: | Shanmuga | Owned by: | Shanmuga |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 1.9.0 |
| Component: | ui.datepicker | Version: | 1.8.23 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Blocked by: | Blocking: |
Description
Tamil month name is not translated instead it is in tamil calendar actual month. It is not August = Avani(tamil month)
Refer:
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
Changed August 27, 2012 12:12PM UTC by comment:1
| component: | ui.core → ui.datepicker |
|---|---|
| owner: | → Shanmuga |
| status: | new → pending |
Changed August 28, 2012 06:15AM UTC by comment:2
| status: | pending → new |
|---|
Tamil month names used in calendar is not the translated instead you have used tamil months. It is different.
Use "ஆகஸ்டு 2012" instead of "ஆவணி 2012" in your demo: http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/localization.html.
Thanks for the good work!
Changed August 28, 2012 11:52AM UTC by comment:3
| status: | new → pending |
|---|
To clarify, you're saying we should use the stand-alone wide months from CLDR? What should we be using for monthNamesShort? Are the day names all correct?
Changed September 12, 2012 08:43AM UTC by comment:4
| resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| status: | pending → closed |
Because we get so many tickets, we often need to return them to the initial reporter for more information. If that person does not reply within 14 days, the ticket will automatically be closed, and that has happened in this case. If you still are interested in pursuing this issue, feel free to add a comment with the requested information and we will be happy to reopen the ticket if it is still valid. Thanks!
Can you please provide more detail than this? Are you saying that the month names we're using apply only to the Tamil calendar and not the Gregorian calendar? It looks like CLDR has different values listed: http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/browser/tags/release-21-0-2/common/main/ta.xml#L1064
Can you confirm that the values in CLDR are what you expect? Also, I'm not sure when to use the format context or the stand-alone context, so if you could specify which values should be listed that would be helpful. Of course, the most helpful thing you could do is to send a pull request with the corrected values.