Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#8988 closed bug (invalid)
button initiated multi-times if multi-instance of jsp append to same html page
Reported by: | deng.hui5 | Owned by: | deng.hui5 |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | none |
Component: | ui.button | Version: | 1.9.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked by: | Blocking: |
Description
assume a jsp page contain some html snippets, then use ajax load this page and insert into a framework html page. the first insertion, I got:
<label for="weekset1" class="ui-state-active ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"> <span class="ui-button-text">Mon</span> </label>
it's fine. after the second insertion, the first snippet is impacted and became:
<label for="weekset1" class="ui-state-active ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"> <span class="ui-button-text"> <span class="ui-button-text">Mon</span> </span> </label>
and after the third insertion, the first snippet became:
<label for="weekset1" class="ui-state-active ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only ui-state-hover" role="button" aria-disabled="false"> <span class="ui-button-text"> <span class="ui-button-text"> <span class="ui-button-text">Mon</span> </span> </span> </label>
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
Owner: | set to deng.hui5 |
---|---|
Status: | new → pending |
Hi deng.hui5, thanks for taking the time to contribute to the jQuery UI project. In order to look into this issue we're going to need a reduced test case showing the problem. You can use this as a starting point - http://jsfiddle.net/tj_vantoll/RKwuk/.
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | pending → closed |
Because we get so many tickets, we often need to return them to the initial reporter for more information. If that person does not reply within 14 days, the ticket will automatically be closed, and that has happened in this case. If you still are interested in pursuing this issue, feel free to add a comment with the requested information and we will be happy to reopen the ticket if it is still valid. Thanks!
code is simple: