#9438 closed bug (invalid)
Datepicker position broken
Reported by: | wizx20 | Owned by: | wizx20 |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | none |
Component: | ui.datepicker | Version: | 1.10.3 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked by: | Blocking: |
Description
jquery-2.0.3.js jquery-ui-1.10.3.js jquery-ui-1.10.3.css (Smoothness)
Browsers checked: chrome (v28), ie9 and ie10.
Example (screen recorded) video: https://skydrive.live.com/#cid=5B4EE758C994C0BB&id=5B4EE758C994C0BB%2174818
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
Owner: | set to wizx20 |
---|---|
Status: | new → pending |
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
Status: | pending → new |
---|
Ok, put this in a long page where you can scroll up and down: http://jsfiddle.net/AEAtB/1/ Guess a video of 1.74mb is too much too handle on your line...
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
Status: | new → pending |
---|
Ok, put this in a long page where you can scroll up and down: http://jsfiddle.net/AEAtB/1/
Ok: http://jsfiddle.net/AEAtB/2/ Now what? Everything looks just fine to me.
Guess a video of 1.74mb is too much too handle on your line...
Videos are worthless. I can't test them in my browser. I can't alter them. I have no way to do any debugging.
---
Please just provide a reduced test case that shows the problem. Explain what's going wrong. If you can't do that, we can't help you.
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | pending → closed |
Because we get so many tickets, we often need to return them to the initial reporter for more information. If that person does not reply within 14 days, the ticket will automatically be closed, and that has happened in this case. If you still are interested in pursuing this issue, feel free to add a comment with the requested information and we will be happy to reopen the ticket if it is still valid. Thanks!
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by
Full page example of the bug: http://onderwijsadvies.preview.gengu.nl/evenementen/
If you hover over a the second calendar-item you will see the position is incorrect.
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by
Sorry, but that's still not a reduced test case. Either you can reproduce the problem with http://jsfiddle.net/AEAtB/2/ or you don't have a bug to report.
I don't have any intention of downloading a video to see a problem. Can you please provide a reduced test case showing the problem instead? You can use http://jsfiddle.net/tj_vantoll/tRdpr/ as a starting point.