#3011 open feature ()

Opened June 17, 2008 07:40PM UTC

Last modified January 25, 2017 12:50PM UTC

Interactions should support bottom and right positioning

Reported by: scottgonzalez Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone: 2.0.0
Component: ui.mouse Version: 1.5
Keywords: Cc:
Blocked by: Blocking:
Description

Resizable and draggable should support bottom and right positioning in addition to the existing top and left positioning.

If it's not possible to detect if the element is already positioned by the bottom or right, then an option should be added for which two sides to use for positioning (default to top left).

Attachments (0)
Change History (15)

Changed October 20, 2008 06:09PM UTC by jzaefferer comment:1

milestone: 1.6 → 1.7

Changed August 13, 2010 05:16AM UTC by ile123 comment:2

Please, add support...

Changed May 03, 2011 11:53AM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:3

component: ui.resizable → ui.mouse
description: Resizable should support bottom and right positioning in addition to the existing top and left positioning. \ \ If it's not possible to detect if the element is already positioned by the bottom or right, then an option should be added for which two sides to use for positioning (default to top left). → Resizable and draggable should support bottom and right positioning in addition to the existing top and left positioning. \ \ If it's not possible to detect if the element is already positioned by the bottom or right, then an option should be added for which two sides to use for positioning (default to top left).
summary: Resizable should support bottom and right positioning → Interactions should support bottom and right positioning

Changed May 03, 2011 11:54AM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:4

#7310 is a duplicate of this ticket.

Changed May 03, 2011 11:54AM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:5

#6209 is a duplicate of this ticket.

Changed February 27, 2012 04:05PM UTC by jzaefferer comment:6

Is this still valid? If so, need to take that into account in the rewrite.

Changed February 27, 2012 04:07PM UTC by rdworth comment:7

Yes, we should support this in the rewrite.

Changed February 27, 2012 04:08PM UTC by jzaefferer comment:8

status: new → open

Changed February 27, 2012 04:10PM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:9

I might as well note that it's impossible to detect, so an option will be necessary.

Changed June 26, 2012 01:22AM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:10

type: enhancement → feature

Changed October 03, 2012 03:34PM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:11

milestone: 1.next → 2.0.0
owner: eduardo
status: open → assigned

Changed October 03, 2012 03:35PM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:12

status: assigned → open

Changed September 26, 2014 01:21PM UTC by tj.vantoll comment:13

#10625 is a duplicate of this ticket.

Changed November 03, 2014 05:39PM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:14

#10677 is a duplicate of this ticket.

Changed April 08, 2015 05:28PM UTC by scottgonzalez comment:15

#7772 is a duplicate of this ticket.